Background:
I had the pleasure of attending the annual ABA International conference in San Antonio Texas last week. One of the talks I went to was entitled “Errorless Learning and Programmed Instruction: The Myth of the Learning Curve.” The talk was prepared by Dr. Murray Sidman (a pioneer in the field of ABA) and read on his behalf as his health prevented him from attending.
Sidman’s main points:
Errorless learning differs from our traditional view of education, in which we believe people have to learn by making mistakes. We refer to this as the “learning curve.”
This view is very entrenched in our society. Dr. Sidman used the example that several decades ago, he worked with others to create an errorless teaching program for a medical school. Part way through the program the class was complaining. When asked why, they said it was because the material was too easy, they weren’t making mistakes and therefore they weren’t learning. The group was convinced to keep at it and when it came test time, they all realized that they had learned in spite of not making mistakes, and it became their favourite class. This is just one example of the success of errorless learning. The literature has many examples. In fact, Sidman argued that using the principles of ABA he could create any shaped learning curve he wanted.
One of the reasons traditional views of education prevail over the notion of errorless learning is that errorless learning puts the onus on the teacher rather than the learner. In the traditional view of education, if a learner makes a mistake or fails to learn something, it is because of something that they are doing or something that is intrinsic to them. It is the “learner’s fault.” In errorless learning, failure to learn is the “fault” of the teacher. The teacher has failed to break down the skill, teach the pre-requisites appropriately or provide the correct prompts for each learner.
How this applies – Shifting the focus to the teacher:
One thing the science of ABA has made clear is that we can’t change behaviour, we can only manipulate the environment that supports it. Therefore, the focus needs to be on our behaviour as the teacher. This makes it harder for the teacher, but easier for the learner.
When working with our kids we need to remember that our goal is errorless learning. We want to minimize errors. If they occur it is not the fault of the learner, but rather a failing on the teacher’s part. If the learner “isn’t getting it” – stop and ask yourself the following questions about your own performance?
• What am I doing?
• What could I change to help the learner?
• Is my schedule of reinforcement too thin?
• Am I manipulating the learner’s motivation?
• Do I have a strong enough reinforcer?
• Am I expecting too much?
• Is what I am asking too hard?
• Could I be using another prompt?
• Does the learner know the pre-requisite skills necessary for this task?
• Am I using shaping?
• Have I required too many consecutive responses?
• Could I vary the presentation of the task?
• Could I be more fun?
• Can I change the expected response? (for example, instead of writing the answer can I have the learner verbally say the answer)
I was a therapist for a long time and I understand that it can be frustrating when a learner isn’t “getting it”. However, it is not their fault, it is the fault of the teaching method. If they aren’t “getting it” this just means the teacher has to change how they are teaching it.
Of course we aren’t going to be perfect in our teaching and that is why we aim for 80% correct for the learner. Hopefully the above questions will help you guide the analysis of your own performance.
Best of luck.
Kristen